Bloggy Archives,  Film & Movie Archives

The Great Gatsby 1974 vs The Great Gatsby 2013

Carey Mulligan & Leonardo DiCaprio vs Mia Farrow and Robert Redford

Did I in fall in love with director Baz Luhrmann’s Moulin Rouge (2001) (starring Nicole Kidman &
Ewan McGregor) not really, but I did love his vision – the spectacle, strangeness, musicality and vaudevillian intention.

I anticipated similar pomp and splash for Lurhmann’s latest inspiration to remake The Great Gatsby.  And when it comes to the big party scene this is what we get, verve, elaborate costumes, gaiety, circus like atmosphere, whirlwind of camera angles, music and dancing, something resembling a scene from a Ziegfield show!  So, obviously Luhrmann was inspired to recreate the Jay Gatsby parties, but was he inspired by the rest of the book? Or was there a point in which he realized the rest of the story doesn’t translate very well into what feels like a staged musical? Not that there’s other dance numbers and singing, just Jay-Z’s tracks pumping in the background, but the movie looks and feels campy & staged. I thought I was down for this, but it became for me, a cartoonish, ham-fisted, parody of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel. 

Baz Luhrmann Party Scene vs Jack Clayton Party Scene

To make matters worse, the next day I re-watched the Robert Redford/Mia Farrow 1974 version directed by Jack
Clayton
with screenplay by Francis Ford Coppola. This is a BEAUTIFUL MOVIE! I hadn’t seen it since my youth, probably around the same time I read the novel.  Now seeing it as an adult who sees a fair amount of movies, I realized this is a well-crafted, perfectly executed adaptation. The opening pewter colored scene panning over Gatsby’s bedroom of a Daisy framed photograph, monogrammed personal items, and oddly, a fly perched on a half eaten egg salad sandwich. Playing over the scene – Irving Berlin’s “What’ll I do”, it all sets the tone perfectly for both the time period and a story of dashed hopes, class and stations, romance and carelessness.

Cut to the opening scene of this 2013 Great Gatsby, where narrator Nick Carraway (Tobey Maguire) is suffering from depression and regret, as he retells the story to a psychiatrist in some stately mental facility.  The 3D effect in this opening scene is also jarring, the lens is so rounded it gives the impression of a snow globe.

In another comparison, the scene where Nick invites Daisy for tea at Jay’s request – Leonardo DiCaprio is made to play the moment with far too much humor, as Jay loses his nerve, departing in the rain and coming back to the door soaking wet.  Where Robert Redford plays his anticipation and nervousness with subtle amusement; his belief that Daisy won’t show even though it’s still 5 minutes before her expected arrival, is endearingly humorous, but not played for laughs. And when it comes to throwing around his catch phrase “Ol’ Sport”,  DiCaprio lays on it annoyingly, with a horrible accent, where Redford throws it in casually, with cultured diction, so much so that when Tom Buchanan (1974 Bruce Dern) challenges him on the “endearment”, you can believe it’s become so much a part of the invention of Jay Gatsby, that he’s unaware of its frequent use. 

Looks the same but Redford/Farrow so much more romantic

I could go on and on, scene for scene, costume for costume, set for set, proving that a remake should never have been attempted. Not unless perhaps it was set modern day; in which case, the contemporary, hip hop soundtrack would have been welcomed. The main issue being, we don’t have actors today with the elan, class, and sophistication of Robert Redford, Mia Farrow, Karen Black, Lois Chile and Sam Waterston.

Tobey Maguire vs Sam Waterston

The still images that I’ve juxtaposed unfortunately allow the actors to look comparable, but that’s because you can’t hear the vast differences between each line lived in the 1974 version, and the same words sledgehammered in 2013. 

Not to mention…

Well, I don’t want to completely break my number 1 rule, which is never to pan a movie.  I always try to highlight the positives, while still interjecting my truth or aesthetic. I suppose I’ve sorta done that, but I feel I should say something else encouraging about the current version…

Oh, I know, Leonardo’s JG sends over an awesome looking cake to Nick’s little cottage for the tea 🙂

LAMB Score 2 out of 5

Tinsel & Tine provides year-round free promotion, sparking conversations and awareness, celebration and reviews of the movie industry - from local indie shorts to international films/filmmakers, to studio driven movies/moviemakers. Mixed with a spotlight on Philly Happenings. #MiniMovieReview #PhillyCalendar

9 Comments

  • jgzeger

    I totally agree, I only wish that the reviewer would have continued comparing the two films aspect by aspect, scene by scene as that would have only added greater weight to his argument that the 1974 version was the better movie.

  • tinseltine.com

    Thanks for writing!
    But I don't agree. I much prefer Nick being summon to Redford's Gatsby. I like that Nick at first wonders if he's in trouble for being at the party and says to the butler guy "I have an invitation".

    Maguire's Nick keeps waiving his invitation around at the party like it's the Golden Ticket from Willy Wonka.

  • Unknown

    Tomorrow I'll be reviewing the 1974 movie but already seen a BIG mistake in the adaptation, and it is the Redfords Gatsby smiles wich suffer the worst part with it. Nick encounters Jay Gatsby casually in the first party he attends, is the only one with an invitation and after being looking from him reconoces a guy casually as a fellow from the war before facing him as Gatsby. In the 1974 movie Nick is taken to him from the party and the smile wich is given by Redford lacks the spontaneous side. Bazz did understand it, and Leo smiles shines properly.

  • Andrew

    Thanks again for the comment, and I'm glad I checked out your site!

    Also, thank you for these side-by-side's of Luhrmann's approach versus Clayton's. One thing that Luhrmann's film failed to do was make almost any of the characters complicit in the events of the film. You can see that perfectly in the difference between Nick in those two photographs. The Waterston Nick of the '74 version is perfect, he has the yearning in his eyes, and is desperately trying not to betray his naivete on his face. Maguire's Nick, while I still think well cast, is all "Golly gee" and little else. That might have worked in a far tighter film, but he's given little agency in the '13 version.

    I remember watching the '74 one during a very sleepy day in high school and I think it's time my adult self paid it a revisit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *