The Great Gatsby 1974 vs The Great Gatsby 2013
Carey Mulligan & Leonardo DiCaprio vs Mia Farrow and Robert Redford |
Did I in fall in love with director Baz Luhrmann’s Moulin Rouge (2001) (starring Nicole Kidman &
Ewan McGregor) not really, but I did love his vision – the spectacle, strangeness, musicality and vaudevillian intention.
I anticipated similar pomp and splash for Lurhmann’s latest inspiration to remake The Great Gatsby. And when it comes to the big party scene this is what we get, verve, elaborate costumes, gaiety, circus like atmosphere, whirlwind of camera angles, music and dancing, something resembling a scene from a Ziegfield show! So, obviously Luhrmann was inspired to recreate the Jay Gatsby parties, but was he inspired by the rest of the book? Or was there a point in which he realized the rest of the story doesn’t translate very well into what feels like a staged musical? Not that there’s other dance numbers and singing, just Jay-Z’s tracks pumping in the background, but the movie looks and feels campy & staged. I thought I was down for this, but it became for me, a cartoonish, ham-fisted, parody of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel.
Baz Luhrmann Party Scene vs Jack Clayton Party Scene |
To make matters worse, the next day I re-watched the Robert Redford/Mia Farrow 1974 version directed by Jack
Clayton with screenplay by Francis Ford Coppola. This is a BEAUTIFUL MOVIE! I hadn’t seen it since my youth, probably around the same time I read the novel. Now seeing it as an adult who sees a fair amount of movies, I realized this is a well-crafted, perfectly executed adaptation. The opening pewter colored scene panning over Gatsby’s bedroom of a Daisy framed photograph, monogrammed personal items, and oddly, a fly perched on a half eaten egg salad sandwich. Playing over the scene – Irving Berlin’s “What’ll I do”, it all sets the tone perfectly for both the time period and a story of dashed hopes, class and stations, romance and carelessness.
Cut to the opening scene of this 2013 Great Gatsby, where narrator Nick Carraway (Tobey Maguire) is suffering from depression and regret, as he retells the story to a psychiatrist in some stately mental facility. The 3D effect in this opening scene is also jarring, the lens is so rounded it gives the impression of a snow globe.
In another comparison, the scene where Nick invites Daisy for tea at Jay’s request – Leonardo DiCaprio is made to play the moment with far too much humor, as Jay loses his nerve, departing in the rain and coming back to the door soaking wet. Where Robert Redford plays his anticipation and nervousness with subtle amusement; his belief that Daisy won’t show even though it’s still 5 minutes before her expected arrival, is endearingly humorous, but not played for laughs. And when it comes to throwing around his catch phrase “Ol’ Sport”, DiCaprio lays on it annoyingly, with a horrible accent, where Redford throws it in casually, with cultured diction, so much so that when Tom Buchanan (1974 Bruce Dern) challenges him on the “endearment”, you can believe it’s become so much a part of the invention of Jay Gatsby, that he’s unaware of its frequent use.
Looks the same but Redford/Farrow so much more romantic |
I could go on and on, scene for scene, costume for costume, set for set, proving that a remake should never have been attempted. Not unless perhaps it was set modern day; in which case, the contemporary, hip hop soundtrack would have been welcomed. The main issue being, we don’t have actors today with the elan, class, and sophistication of Robert Redford, Mia Farrow, Karen Black, Lois Chile and Sam Waterston.
Tobey Maguire vs Sam Waterston |
The still images that I’ve juxtaposed unfortunately allow the actors to look comparable, but that’s because you can’t hear the vast differences between each line lived in the 1974 version, and the same words sledgehammered in 2013.
Not to mention…
Well, I don’t want to completely break my number 1 rule, which is never to pan a movie. I always try to highlight the positives, while still interjecting my truth or aesthetic. I suppose I’ve sorta done that, but I feel I should say something else encouraging about the current version…
Oh, I know, Leonardo’s JG sends over an awesome looking cake to Nick’s little cottage for the tea 🙂
LAMB Score 2 out of 5
9 Comments
Anonymous
Hi glad to have found your write up of the two movies. As a passionate fan of the book and Fitzgerald the author, I find the calmness of the 1974 moving to be more compelling and moving. The modern film 2013 which I was interested in going to and also had my mind open to experience in a Baz format, was truly disapointing. I felt it lacked emotion the point that Fitzgerald was trying to make. Baz's film was so fast paced and helter skelter that I started to lose interest about 35 minutes in. I tend to think that young people will like it because it caters to our many of the ADD youth out there who cannot focus for more than 5 minutes at a time.
tinseltine.com
Glad people are still making comments about this post! Thanks for your feedback, love what you said – "no 'right' version, everyone just has different taste".
It's great to hear other people's opinions, as long as they're respectfully written and Thank God all the people that comment on Tinsel & Tine (and I wish there were more) are good commentators. Thank you for that 🙂
Anonymous
I'm now realizing the earlier version had it's good qualities. I still believe though that the 1974 characters are very uninteresting or strange and many scenes are boring and lack emotion. I also have to disagree with that version being more faithful to the script. The fondness Nick feels for Gatsby is completely unevident. And I find it hard to take 1974 Tom seriously, he seems so passive. That being said, the 2013 version is over the top, but I enjoy that. I realize that there is no 'right' version, everyone just has different taste.
tinseltine.com
Thanks jgzeger,
There were some other good points I wanted to make in comparison, but I didn't want it to seem like I was beating a dead horse 🙂